Commonlaw Copyright © 2010 My Private Audio web Site - All Rights Reserved
Anne Batte | www.OperationRest.org
Talkshoe ID: 39904 | Conference Call Information | Aug. 26th, 2010
- Case B Manufactured Assignment showing alleged forged signatures by Citibank representatives signing on behalf of MERS and proven forged Notary signature.
- Copy of Jaime Hardcastle's Authentic Signature on his personal residence Deed to Secure Debt.
- State of Missouri Dennis Lueke Official signature and Public Oath of Office filing from Secretary of Stateshows notary signature and no corporate seal.
- Jaime Hardcastle screen shots 1 and 2
(See notes: Required documents before foreclosing entity can legally foreclose)
- Case C Manufactured Assignment showing another alleged forged signature of the same Jaime Hardcastle present on the Assignment of Mary Ann Houser Tavarez.
- Copy of Jaime Hardcastle's Authentic Signature.
- Case D Promissory Note with forged endorsement (same person used on two endorsements)
- Manufactured Assignment showing alleged forged signatures by foreclosure attorneys signing as representatives of MERS. Notary signature forged,
as evidenced by official Certificate of Appointment of Notary Public.
- The Deed Under Power pg 1 showing foreclosure attoorneys signing as representatives of Wells Fargo. No corporate seal. The Deed Under Power Last pg Notary Signature Andrew McKenzie
- Case E Manufactured Assignment showing alleged forged signatures by foreclosure attorneys signing as representatives of MERs. Notary signature allegedly forged. No Corporate seal.
Talkshoe ID: 39904 | Conference Call Information | Aug. 26th, 2010
- Case A Manufactured assignment showing alleged forged signatures by foreclosure attorneys signing as representatives of MERS. Notary did not witness. Assignment filed just pior to sale date.
- Screen print of McCalla Raymer webites showing Associate Attorneys' name.
- Screenprint showing notary appointment date (outside of the 4 year limit). No corporate seal
The documentation enclosed is intended to educate recipients about the criminal activity occuring within the foreclosure process. This study was initiated after borrowers were foreclosed on during the trial modification period, short sale processing period, and modification processing period. It has been observed borrowers responsibility requested accounting verification, made proper and regular payments, and filed correct paperwork for processing. Yet, the foreclosure prodeeded, robbing the borrowers of due process.
It has also been observed that judges are not requiring the foreclosurs entities to produce proper documentation, and the foreclosure process is being allowed unchecked.
It is this writer's hope that the provision of this information will cause change and accountability within the courts, the mortgage servicing companies, and the attorneys and processors in the default management functions.
Package presented to FBI office Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Foreclosure Fraud – Guide to Looking Up Public Records
NEW ARTICLES
Judge Schack Blows MERS & New York Bank
Lawsuit Claims Suspicious Signature
On Foreclosure Documents video
